Sunday, August 16, 2020

The Parisian - Book Review

I’ve read several beautifully written memoirs by Palestinians touching on the events that led to the creation of the state of Israel. This is however the first English language novel of that period, I’ve come across. The Parisian is an ambitious historical fiction work with a main anchor in Nablus in Palestine from early in the twentieth century to the early days of the Arab Revolt in the late 1930’s. A secondary anchor is France and life in France under the First World War. 


Isabella Hammad is a master painter of settings, her beautiful lyrical prose breathes life in places. Hammad transports the readers to Montepillier gardens, streets and houses, and to the dinner parties and the sophistication of an affluent segment of the French society. With equal mastery Hammad takes the reader to Nablus and the rugged mountains around it, the olive groves, the crowded homes and the bustling streets. 


Midhat Kamel, the central character of the novel, a Nabulsi son to a merchant who is sent to France for education during the war years and comes back to live in Palestine in the turbulent years following the fall of the Ottoman Empire and subsequent British Mandate over Palestine. While the reader gets to know a lot about this central character, he remains aloof, distant even after some 550 pages. The other characters of the novel are sketched by Hammad around Midhat, most are not fully developed beyond their physical appearance and their interactions related to Midhat. 


Hammad displays great knowledge of history, the novel recreates the early days of the Jewish immigarstion into Palestine and beautifully crafts the Palestinian search and development of their identity: Syrian, Arab, Palestinian, Muslim. Hammad humanized the various adversaries, the Jewish immigrants were not made out to be the baddies nor were the Samaritans or other Arabs. The Turks, the French and the British were painted as the cruel masters. 


The part of the story novel that deal with Qassam revolt was particularly fascinating. The tension between the urban city dwellers and the felaheen peasantry was well portrayed. I particularly found Hammad treatment of the issue of women veiling clever. After city women started shedding the veil, they were forced to adopt it again by the adherents of Qassam. This part of the novel reminded me of the beautiful memoir of Afaf Kenfani who viewed Palestinian women struggle for freedom from men as ultimately now less than the struggle against Zionism. 


The breadth of the novel and its adherence to the generally undisputed events of history may have made it difficult for Hammad to develop her characters and plot more fully. At the end we have a beautifully crafted  impressionist painting of characters on top of a vivid historical photograph. 

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

On Patents & IP in the Middle East: To Patent or Not to Patent

The “idea” can often be the most precious asset to a startup founder at the early stages. Many Middle Eastern startups worry about sharing their “idea” for fear of having it “stolen”. Most eventually grow out of this fear and come to accept that the “idea” is a relatively small factor in the overall success or failure of their company. Yet in some cases, the “idea” plays a much bigger role; the “idea” is the cornerstone of the business. In these cases, we would be looking at inventions with the startup being a way of commercializing the inventions. 

An example of a company created to commercialize an invention is Velcro, where we see a global organization built to promote and exploit an invention. Other startups create inventions along the way, Uber started out as a ride-hailing service, but wound up building a patent portfolio around geolocation, security, autonomous vehicles and a whole range of other related fields. In all cases, inventions are the intellectual property (IP) of a business and just like any asset in a business, IP can be highly valuable or of minimal value, it can be a tool to help the business grow and defend its position, or it can be a time consuming and costly process with little return. So how do you decide whether to patent or not to patent and should you finally decide to patent your invention, how and where should you do it?

In this article, I will be examining some aspects of IP, focusing on helping Middle Eastern startups navigate the topic. I will be drawing on my own prior experiences as CEO of a tech company as well as issues I dealt with managing IP disputes for others. 

Is this an invention or not? The answer to this question requires starting with what is known as “patent search”. Whenever I hear a startup pitch that contains expressions such as “invention” or “unique” product, design, or method, I go to Google Patents or other similar patent databases and search for patents in the general market area. This could be on the design of specific IoT devices, use of gamification for certain applications, new material for clothing, or some method for separating waste or enhancing texts or faces in pictures. The initial search usually leads to more questions and as with most online searches, one can dig deeper and deeper. Patent Search is a service offered by specialists; my fundamental advice is to review what is out there already, and several online sources help with the concept of patent search. 

Can an invention be patented? IP is often associated with patents, yet IP may be protected by other means such as copyright. In many cases, it is impossible to succeed in a patent application for an invention that is mainly software, but software copyright can offer some protection. This article here addresses copyright registration to maximize the protection of software. While the vast majority of software inventions can’t be patented, certain algorithms and conceptual approaches to workflow may be patented.

Should it be patented? In some cases, an invention can be patented, but this entails full disclosure of the “secret sauce”. In my previous company, my cofounder invented a highly cost-effective method for making RFID cards, which entailed the use of a certain chemical compound used in the fashion industry. We debated long and hard to patent or not patent! To patent means that we disclose our secret sauce. Not to patent means competitors can potentially reverse engineer what we did and discover our methodology, but we would have had the advantage of time. We ended up pursuing a patent. Sometimes a patent is not necessarily the best way to protect valuable IP; total secrecy might be better. 

Patents as defensive v. offensive weapons! In certain areas of technology, we find a high concentration of patents. In my world of security and identification technology, particularly issues related to RFID (Radio-frequency identification), and NFC (Near-field communication) both are used to facilitate identification and communication between  devices, patents were as much a defensive strategy as they were offensive. Defensive strategy means a company has the “freedom to operate” and offer its products and services without being accused of infringing some other company’s patents.  Building a product based on a patented technology can help in arguing that such a product is innovative and does not infringe other patents.. It can also be used as an offensive weapon against any potential infringements, preventing others from offering similar products and thus offering the advantage of exclusivity.

Where to file? The knee jerk reaction is the US because it is the country typically associated with the largest market and most generous infringement awards. Also, the US patent office tends to be more willing to grant a broader scope for inventions than most European patent authorities. But pursuing patents in the US can be lengthy and expensive. So the answer may well be to apply for a patent in Egypt or Saudi Arabia, especially if you see that the tech area has significant patent activity and if you are not pursuing the US market. In some cases, the main motive is defensive, to be free to operate without the threat of infringing others’ IP;  the least expensive and the fastest option maybe best. In cases where the main motive is offensive, the US or Europe might be better options. 

Are patents useful in raising funds? Yes and no! YES because they offer investors some tangible evidence of the founder’s technical strength and innovation. Moreover, with many Middle Eastern startups seeking tech company valuations while not actually being tech companies, patents help in offering differentiation in the “startup marketplace”. But the answer can also be NO: because patents consume a lot of costs and startups that are excessively patent focused may find it hard to pivot. Some would forgo more optimal solutions in favor of utilizing their patent and wind up in the dilemma of “a solution waiting for a problem”. Investing in a company with an IP portfolio typically elevates the level of due diligence and discussions, which may help or hinder in raising funds. 

In conclusion, IP is just like every other asset of a startup business;  it needs to be a tool of the business and protecting it needs to be aligned with the goals of that business.

(This article first appeared here on Waya

Saturday, June 13, 2020

For Iyad Hallak


 

Wael El Ghossien wrote a beautiful tribute to Iyad Halak. This is my translation. Wael is no stranger to autism, for his own beloved son is autistic.

Iyad was a victim of excessive police force, killed by the Israeli police in Jerusalem The timing of this tragedy, in the wake of the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis meant that Iyad’s death didn’t get much media attention.

 This tribute focuses on the gentleness of Iyad, what made him comfortable, what frightened him and what made him happy.

I don’t understand why they did this to me …
From my younger days I found myself to be different from other children,
not all the kids were like me,
I don’t know why.
Was always scared of stuff around me,
didn’t know why.
Couldn’t grasp stuff my own way
needed time to acclimate ... to get used to stuff.
Some stuff I got used to
other stuff I couldn’t,
I didn’t go to the school other kids went to,
was scared and fearful
of crowds,
of lots of people around me that I didn’t know.
I didn’t play football,
didn’t play other games kids played down the alleyway,
the kids were different ... not like me
or maybe I wasn’t like them.
I was scared to get hurt,
get a wound
am scared of wounds,
I fear blood
didn’t play.

Scared of the police and military with machine guns
not sure what the guns are,
if they can hurt
or not.
Was scared to walk alone
only felt safe when my mother or father were there
or others I know and feel safe with.
Once I got used to something, I was OK
I can continue.
Change … frightens me
I need time …
time to get used to stuff
not easy for me to get used to stuff.
Many things make me different
not like others
I act different.

How happy I was when they sent me to Center:
others were just like me,
scared like me.
People helping us learn
to get things others already know,
people who didn’t hurt us.
At first, was scared to go to Center on my own.
How happy I became when used to it,
relieved ... happy to go alone.

I take the trash bag and go to Center:
my routine
I see military with guns
I look at the soldiers ... and the people
and keep walking to the trash dump.
I throw the bag and go to Center
I get to the people that comfort me at the Center.

It’s been a month with no Center,
am on edge
not used to not going.
Mother took me two, three times last month ...
first time Center was closed
second time closed
third time closed again:
don’t know why closed.

Today mother told me: Center is open
I was happy … so very happy,
am going back to what I’ve been doing
for six years .. I got used to it.

I ate my mother’s breakfast
she helped me shave my beard
I took the trash bag
I left home
I was happy
walked happy ... but things looked different,
street was empty
not many people
but not important …
same street …
same way to Center ...
it will fill with people again.

I came close to the soldiers
they were yelling at me,
something very loud.
Didn’t understand them:
they wait for my answer
they think I can answer…
can’t talk like them
can’t
I can’t talk … at all.

They shouted,
I am scared,
why are they shouting
what did I do?
I am carrying the trash bag:
open it!
More shouting and yelling.
I run,
I run to the dump to put the trash bag
I throw the trash to go to the Center
that’s what I do: trash then Center.
Center ... the people I like
make me comfortable.

I fell on the floor at the dump,
what’s happening
who are these people?
Why are they mean to me?
What’s going on?
Let me throw my trash,
let me go to the Center,
to the people I know:
Let me go.

I hear the voice of my teacher telling them something,
am relieved to hear her voice,
she’ll explain,
she’ll tell them what I can’t say,
she will speak the words I don’t have
it will be solved
it will be over
it will be over…

I don’t know what happened,
I am in pain,
a lot of pain.
I don’t know what happened
and what’s happening.
Why did they do this me?
I don’t understand…

Friday, January 04, 2019

خواطر عن الزواج

احب حضور الأفراح والمشاركة فيها ولكن دايما اشعر بنوع من الشفقة على العروسين ... تشمل عادة طقوس الأفراح في الغرب التعهد العلني من الطرفين بالحب والود والرعاية .. إلى الأبد! في الشرق نفس الفكرة تسود ومع وجود وكلاء للعريس والعروس بكتب الكتاب بطريقة تذكرني بصفقات دمج الشركات. شراء ودمج الشركات هي المادة التي أقوم بتدريسها منذ سنوات ولذا اتجه الى تحليل فكرة الزواج من منظور مشابهة لأفكار دمج الشركات. طرق دمج الشركات تشمل الشراء acquisition وهنالك أيضا فكرة الملكية المشتركة لشركات او المشروع المشترك  joint venture او JV.

نعود الى الزواج،  تقليديا وتاريخيا الفكرة الأساسية في الزواج هي تعهد الزوجين باقامة شراكة  حصرية : عاطفية... اجتماعية... أسرية ..اقتصادية .. جنسية! بدأت فكرة الزواج أساسا لتحقيق احتياجات بيولوجية للجنس والسلالة. الجنين البشري يتطلب عناية لسنوات طويلة ولهذا استمرار وحماية السلالة تتطلب مجهود و رعاية  من الذكر والأنثى معا. عندما أنظر الى العالم القديم او الانسان البدائي بمنظور افكار إدارة الأعمال ودمج الشركات، الزواج كان فعلا فكرة عظيمة، زواج بعد البلوغ بسنوات قليلة، متوسط أعمار منخفض، أخطار متعددة، نسبة وفاة أطفال مرتفعة ... أهداف الانثى والذكر كانت محدودة جدا:  الطعام، الأمان، الجنس، الذرية!

تقدمت الإنسانية ووصلت الى عصرنا الحالي وما صاحبه من تقدم طبي واجتماعي واقتصادي. احصائيات الزواج في العالم تشير الى انخفاض نسب الزواج وبالذات في الدول المتقدمة. تتحول تدريجيا أهداف الزواج في المجتمعات المتقدمة من الجنس والسلالة الى المشاركة الحياتية. صاحب الانخفاض في نسب الزواج في الغرب ارتفاع في نسب الطلاق. عندما انظر بمنظور إدارة الأعمال وفكرة ال JV أو المشروع المشترك ارى ان هذا شيئ طبيعي وربما صحي. عند إنشاء JV يتفق الطرفان على طرق حله، لأن نجاح واستمرار ال JV يتطلب استمرار وجود ما نسميه value added أو القيمة المضافة  بمعنى ان كل من الطرفين يقدم للآخر شئ إضافي وفي حالة توقف تقديم القيمة الإضافية يتم حل المشروع بالطرق المتفق عليها.

نعود الى دول الشرق ونجد أمامنا تغيرات عديدة، اولا ارتفاع متوسط الأعمار وانخفاض معدلات وفاة الأطفال وهذا يعني ان ما كان شراكة تدوم ما بين عشر او عشرين سنة وحمل وولادة كل عام تحول الى شراكة اطول وعدد أطفال اقل.... تغيرت طبيعة الحياة، لم يعد الذكر المسئول الأول عن الحماية البدنية مثل الإنسان البدائي ولم تعد الأنثى مشغولة بحمل وأطفال تولد واطفال تمرض وتموت. يستمر الزواج في بعض الحالات في الشرق كصفقة بيع acquisition وهذا امر معروف ومحزن ولكن لن اتعرض له هنا وأركز على فكرة الزواج الذي يتم برغبة الطرفين وفكرة المشروع المشترك JV.

اذا نظرنا الى الزواج بفكرة المشروع المشترك يتحتم علينا أيضا ان لا ننظر بالضرورة الى الطلاق كفشل للزواج. الطلاق ماهو الا نهاية لل JV ومع التطور الاجتماعي وتغيير الأهداف وتغيير مقاييس الطلاق شيئ طبيعي وأفضل من الاستمرار في JV لا يحقق value added او قيمة إضافية. لماذا نبدأ بالحديث عن الطلاق قبل بداية الحديث عن أهداف الزواج العصري في الشرق؟ سبب أساسي واحد وهو قناعتي الكاملة أن تغيير الأهداف شي طبيعي وان أهدافك اليوم كشاب أو شابة في العشرينيات أو الثلاثينيات لن تستمر نفسها على مدى حياتك. الاحتياجات تتغير ومن الطبيعي أن تتغير الأهداف ... من المستحيل في مجتمعنا الحالي أن نتنبأ باحتياجاتنا وأهدافنا لباقي حياتنا. مع تغير الأهداف قد نجد الطرفين قادرين على التواكب أو غير راغبين او قادرين. هل نرغم أحد الأطراف على عدم تغيير أهدافه او أهدافها او قبول استمرار علاقة لا تضيف المطلوب؟

الجاذبية الجنسية و الغرائز البيولوجية أمور طبيعية كاحتياجات وأهداف من المشروع المشترك JV وقد تكفي لفترة محدودة، كذلك أهداف الاستقلال عن الاسرة وبناء بيت وحياة اجتماعية مع وجود توافق بين الطرفين كلها أهداف مشروعة. ولكن مع تطور المجتمع، نجد أهداف الجزء الأعلى من هرم مازلو للاحتياجات مثل عزة النفس وتحقيق الذات تسيطر على الوجدان وتصبح السبب الأساسي لسعادة او تعاسة الانسان.

ما هو الحل إذن؟ هل الحل هو تجنب الزواج مثل ما ارى من العديد من أصدقائي ومعارفي في العشرينات والثلاثينات؟ قبول فكرة ان الأهداف قابلة للتغيير أمر في غاية الأهمية لأنه يعني ان علاقة زوجية استمرت عدة سنوات وانتهت بالطلاق لا يعني بالضرورة أن العلاقة كانت فاشلة. يقاس النجاح والفشل باي شي في تحقيق الأهداف. قدرتنا كبشر على توقع رغباتنا المستقبلية المتغيرة وقدرة الآخرين على تحقيق هذه الأهداف المستقبلية أمور غاية في الصعوبة. الأمر الهام هنا هو الصراحة والوضوح بين الطرفين قبل الإقبال على الشراكة. أعي تماما أن هنالك العديد من التعقيدات المتعلقة بالأطفال ولكن أحد الدروس التي نراها في الغرب مع ارتفاع نسب الطلاق إن سعادة ونجاح الأطفال ليست مرتبطة باستمرار زواج والديهم او طلاقهم إذا لم يكن الطلاق مليئ بالمشاجرة والخناق والمشاكل الاقتصادية.

الملخص: حدد أهدافك في منظور خمس او عشر سنوات وكن صريح مع الطرف الأخر وحاول الاتفاق بالتفصيل عن كيفية فك الشراكة اذا وصلت لهذه المرحلة.  هل هذا كلام عقلاني او حكيم أو عملي؟ هو ليس سهل بلا جدال ولكنه أفضل من الخوف الأبدي من الارتباط أو الارتباط المبني على احتياجات أسفل هرم مازلو ( اكل شرب أمان جنس أولاد) وبعدها بسنوات قليلة تجد نفسك تعيس لأن احتياجاتك من اعلى الهرم.

Monday, November 20, 2017

On The 100th Anniversary of The Balfour Declaration: An Inconvenient History For Egypt And Israel

Balfour_declaration_unmarked.jpgAs we mark the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, it is, perhaps, helpful to revisit the neglected history of Egypt’s relationship with Zionism and with Israel. In this essay, I shall be looking at some interesting, yet puzzling historical facts that it would be beneficial for Egyptians, Israelis and others to explore. I shall also be exploring what Zionism meant to Egyptians in 1917 and what it came to mean later.
Egypt’s reaction to the Balfour Declaration was unreservedly favorable
Contrary to widespread belief, in 1917, and for over a decade after that, the Balfour Declaration was not seen by most Egyptian intellectuals as detrimental to Palestine. Interestingly enough, some Egyptian Muslim and Christian families held parties to celebrate the declaration. Telegrams of gratitude were sent to Lord Balfour by the then-Governor of Alexandria Ahmad Ziour Pasha, a Muslim.
“The Governor of Alexandria Ahmad Ziour Pasha – later Prime Minister of Egypt – went to a party in the city celebrating the Balfour Declaration, that culminated in their sending a telegram to Lord Balfour to thank him,” according to Leila Ahmed in “A Border Passage”.
A delegation of leading Muslims and Christians traveled to congratulate the Jews of Palestine. Many Egyptian Zionist leaders were also Egyptian nationalists and fully committed to the cause of independence from Britain.
Egyptians support of the Balfour Declaration lasted beyond 1917. The Grand Sheikh of Al Azhar officially hosted Chaim Weizmann, co-author of the draft of the declaration submitted to Lord Balfour, when he visited Egypt on his way to Palestine in 1918. The Grand Sheikh was alleged to have made a donation of 100 EGP to the Zionist cause, Egyptian academic and writer Mohamed Aboulghar in his book about the Jews of Egypt confirms the meeting but alleges that actually a donation was made by Weismann to Al Azhar. Weizmann’s cultivation of regional support for the Zionist movement extended to his efforts with the rulers of Hijaz where he executed an accord with Emir Faisal endorsing the Declaration.

The Hebrew University was one of the early dreams of the Zionist movement, in 1918 construction commenced. Ahmed Lutfi el-Sayed, the renowned Egyptian nationalist, political leader and first director of Cairo University joined the celebration for the grand opening of Hebrew University in 1925. In 1944, Taha Hussien, one of Egypt’s most influential literary figures also visited the Hebrew University.
As the Jewish migration to Palestine continued, tensions between the Palestinians and the migrant population increased. The hardline Zionists, referred to as Revisionist Zionists, and early Islamists such as Mufti Husseini, the mufti of Jerusalem, played a large part in whipping up mutual resentment, fear and anger. These tensions culminated in the 1929 Palestine Riots in late August with the massacres of Jews in Hebron, Safad among others.
The reaction in Egypt remained decidedly pro Zionism well into the first half of the 1930’s, the Government reportedly banned the word ‘Palestine’ from Friday prayers, according to the Leila Ahmed.
The Wafed Government shutdown the sole Palestinian publication with the charge of being pro Palestinian propaganda. Zionist newspapers and magazines continued to operate freely well into the late 1940’s.


Egypt’s Role in Saving Jews from Nazi Europe
The US turned back the SS St. Louis which was full of Jews escaping Germany. Many of those refugees later perished in Nazi concentration camps. Three years later, the US authorities were shamefully still turning back Jews fleeing Nazi Europe. Holocaust Museums mention these stories in detail, yet the fact that Alexandria welcomed Jewish refugees, indeed was only one of a handful of ports, globally, open to Jews escaping from Nazi atrocities that hardly got a mention. For this is another inconvenient history.
Andre Aciman, an Egyptian Jew born and raised in Alexandria, told stories narrated by his family; some Egyptian Jews were not so keen on the influx of Ashkenazi Jews into Alexandria, according to “Out of Egypt”, a memoir by André Aciman.
In readings about World War II and the horrors the Jews faced at the hands of advancing Nazi armies or nationalist partisans, whether Russians, Ukrainians, Serbians or other local populations, it is worth noting that Alexandria, the city that once had the largest Jewish population in Egypt, did not record any attacks on Jewish property and lives when Hitler’s army was just 70 miles to the west.
As the advancing Nazi’s carried out raids on the western parts and the naval port of Alexandria, the number of violent anti-British acts, by Egyptians opposed to the British occupation of Egypt, increased.
Yet no signs of hate or anger against Jews surfaced. The Jews of Alexandria worried about the advancing of the Nazi army but did not fear their Egyptian neighbors, according to Aciman. This is rather strange when so much of the hate propaganda presents Egyptians and Jews as natural enemies. While the self-proclaimed “non-violent” Muslim Brotherhood had indeed started to attack Jews in graffiti, boycotts and worse around 1937 in certain cities, there appear to have been no such attacks during the time of impending entry of Hitler’s army into Alexandria. This should be contrasted with horrible anti-semitic violence Jews witnessed in most European cities.
Joel Beinin offers a concise essay covering Egyptian Jews in the first half of the twentieth century. It is important to note that Beinin has faced relentless attacks from staunch Zionists, much of Beinin’s history can be validated by personal and family narratives such as those of Andre Aciman and others. Aciman too, who wrote a very personal memoir, has also faced attacks from the same quarters that attacked Beinin. Yet both writers’ work calls into question the supposed hate and natural animosity between Egyptians and Jews while never mincing their words on the rise of antisemitism in Egypt.

Yad Vashem, other memorials and Holocaust history in general, offers no special recognition of the role that Egypt and Egyptians played in saving the lives of Jews. A disgusting byproduct of the recent rise of anti-Semitism in Egypt with the wide circulation of books by Holocaust deniers, is that few Egyptians are even aware of this important history that Egypt and all Egyptians should be proud of.
Operation Susannah, more widely known as the Lavon Affair

In the early autumn of 1952, a few months after the July 23 Coup D’etat that led to the overthrow of King Farouk, Mohammad Naguib, Egypt’s first President, joined the celebration of the Jewish New Year, Rosh Hashana, at a Synagogue in the heart of Cairo.
Photographs of the event and Naguib’s words were widely reported in the press. Naguib’s message to the Jews of Egypt was that they had nothing to worry about from the 1948 War with Israel and that Egypt’s Jews were just as much an integral part of its fabric as their Muslim and Christian brothers. Naguib had given similar remarks on a visit to the Jewish Hospital in Alexandria among others.
In the immediate aftermath of the 1948 war, a minority of the Jews of Egypt left for Israel and those were mainly Ashkenazi Jews that had come to Egypt as refugees along with a minority of Karaite, Sephardic and other Rabbinic Jews that believed deeply in Zionism. Six full years after the establishment of the state of Israel, Egyptian Jews largely remained in place and minimal immigration had occurred from Egypt to Israel. Naguib’s strategy of fighting Zionism through attempts to integrate Egypt’s Jews further in the society showed good results.
Israeli Military Intelligence, possibly to spur Egyptian Jewish immigration, as well as attempting to derail the Egyptian American relationship, carried out a large number of terrorist attacks in Cairo and Alexandria. The Egyptian born terrorists and their Israeli handler were caught, tried and sentenced. Following Egypt’s defeat in the 1967 war, the imprisoned terrorists were exchanged for Egyptian POW’s.  Israel kept their return secret and continued its obfuscation of the Operation. In 1971, Golda Meir, the fourth prime minister of Israel, attended the wedding of one of the terrorists. In 1975, the four terrorists appeared on Israeli TV, where they recounted their story of “heroism”, they have received more honors as recently as in 2005.
Zakryah Mohyeldin, then Egypt’s Minister of Interior, used the very same language as Naguib and talked of Egypt’s Jewish sons as he reacted to Operation Susannah, according to Beinin. Yet hate speech towards Jews was growing in the Egyptian discourse; Muslim Brotherhood followers targeted all Jews regardless of their views towards Israel and intensified their language of hate.
Various attempts to rewrite the history of the Lavon affair continued even into the 21st century. The Israeli MOD continues to redact sections of their disclosures so many years later.  Israelis will at some point need to come to terms with the some of the ugly aspects of the history of their nation. Egyptians will need to learn that anti-Semitism plays into the hands of Israel’s right wing which consistently advocates exclusivity as the only way to defend Jews from ever hateful enemies.
Prior to 1967 War, no Egyptian Jews were expelled for being Jewish
Egyptian citizenship laws were first introduced in 1929 after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the birth of Egypt as a modern pluralistic nation-state in 1922-1923.  Ottoman nationals and others, who were born in Egypt prior to 1914, regardless of religion, had the choice of becoming Egyptian.
Most Sephardic Jews whose families came to Egypt in the second half of the 19th century sought alternatives to Egyptian Citizenship. It should be noted that Egypt’s native Jews, whether Karaite Jews or Rabbinic (non-Ladino) Jews had roots in Egypt dating back millennia. It is unclear how many Egyptian Jews actually wanted the Egyptian nationality. Beinin talks of increasing difficulties acquiring Egyptian nationality, faced by the Jews, in the 1940’s especially after the first wave of “Egyptianization” laws introduced in 1947. Several Karaite Jews actively lobbied for the “Egyptianization” laws as a way of proving their allegiance to Egypt according to Beinin.
Leftover from the days of outright British and French domination, was a typical colonial justice system that saw local Egyptians subject to Egyptian Law and courts, while the European minorities were subject to their own laws and consular courts. Many of the more affluent Sephardic Jews living in Egypt for two or even three generations did not regard themselves as Egyptians and spoke little or no Egyptian Arabic.
Aciman details the history of typical Ladino speaking Egyptian born Jews who pursued European citizenship. Beinin writes of Jews who actually purchased French and British nationalities without ever setting a foot in these countries. The percentage of non-Karaite Jews who opted for the Egyptian Citizenship is not known but, as Beinin explored, it was limited. Aciman tells a story of a relative who pursued Italian Citizenship following a fire that destroyed Italian birth archives which enabled some Jews who had never set foot in Italy to apply for and obtain Italian citizenship.
According to Benin, “…between the Arab-Israeli wars of 1948 and 1956 a substantial portion of the Jewish elite remained in Egypt and continued to play a significant, though diminishing, role in its economic life.”
The friendly policy towards Zionism by Egypt came to an end in the period leading to and especially following the 1948 War. Once vibrant Egyptian Zionist associations and papers were banned and those openly advocating a Zionist agenda expelled or detained.
Some Egyptian Jews were fervently anti-Zionist and they were typically communists targeted by the wrath of the state and detained with other non-Jewish communists. The first wave of expulsions targeted Zionist and communist Jews who did not hold Egyptian citizenship. This does not appear to have been a large number.
Following the Suez War, citizens of France and the UK were evicted from Egypt. Some Jewish families were divided as those who held British or French citizenships, whether Jewish or not, had to leave Egypt. The third wave of departures commenced with the introduction of socialism in Egypt with the 1957 Egyptianization Laws. These culminated in a mass nationalization of private property and businesses with the 1961 Nationalization Laws which targeted foreign and Egyptian capitalists. The biggest exodus was actually Greek and Italian.
“After 1952 the Italian Egyptians were reduced – from the nearly 60,000 of 1940 – to just a few thousands. Most Italian Egyptians returned to Italy during the 1950s and 1960s,” quoting Italian emigration records.
Those wealthy Egyptians, of various religions, who could manage to escape with even a fraction of their fortunes did so. Needless to say, by end of the nationalization phase, the number of remaining Jews was greatly diminished, but as of then not a single Jew who held Egyptian nationality was forced to leave solely because he or she was Jewish.
Detention of Egyptian Jews, forced surrender of Egyptian Nationality and Expulsion
From the early hours of the 1967 war, the Egyptian authorities started rounding up scores of Jewish men on suspicion of spying for Israel. Several hundred Egyptian Jews were rounded up from all over Egypt and were imprisoned, with members of the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood, in the notorious Abu Zaabal and Tora Prisons. Marc Khedr tells in detail of his experience from June 6, 1967, until his release over three years later. These Egyptian Jews were subjected to indefinite detention, never faced concrete charges and were never actually sentenced. They were kept in prison just on suspicion of collaboration with Israel, for being Jews.
To get out of Egypt, these Egyptians had to renounce their Egyptian Citizenship, undertake never to return to Egypt and were taken from their prison cells straight to the airport to board flights to France. Khadr’s use of language, referring to concentration camps, invites two unfortunate comparisons.
The first comparison is to the Nazi concentration camps, the other to the other political prisoners who were there before the capture of the Jews and whose detention outlasted theirs. This in no way diminishes the injustice and suffering that Mr. Khedr and other Egyptian Jews faced. Mr. Khedr, a Karaite Jew whose mother tongue was Egyptian Arabic and whose original name Mourad Amin Khedr, a typical Egyptian name, was fully Egyptian in all aspects of the word.  It was bigotry and discrimination, suspicion and mistrust by the State and fellow Egyptians that led to the loss of homeland for Egyptian Jews and the loss for Egypt of its own Jewish people.
Where are we 100 Years after the Balfour Declaration?
As mentioned above, history has been rewritten by both Egypt and Israel to suit the chosen narrative. The fact that Egyptian Jews were often in the forefront of Egypt’s liberation movement has been conveniently forgotten or ignored. The Egyptian’s support for the Balfour Declaration has been forgotten and history was rewritten to erase it. The role Islamic Nationalism has played in support of the ascendence of the uncompromising radical Revisionist Zionism can be seen clearly from the early 1920’s. Later, Revisionist Zionism came to dominate the Zionist discourse. The role Zionism played in strengthening Islamism, Islamic and Arab Nationalism as a counterbalance to it continues to our present day.
The lack of recognition of Egypt’s role in saving Jewish lives in the dark days of WWII should be an embarrassment to Egypt, Israel and world Jewry. It doesn’t fit the narrative of animosity. The narrative of Egypt throwing out Jews and the exodus of Jews from Egypt fits with the, now dominant Zionist narrative. Egypt lost a great deal from the exodus of the foreign communities whether Greek, Italian, Turkish, French or British. It is crucial to see the exodus of Egypt’s Jews for what it was and it was primarily an exodus of foreigners. The bigotry, racism and discrimination that followed several wars with Israel is abhorrent and should not be defended. However, it does not tell of ancient animosity between Egyptians and Jews, indeed it highlights the opposite. Some in Israel are beginning to question the language that has been used to describe the Jewish exodus from Egypt.
It is hard to reach a conclusion as to what the Zionist movement’s true aims were: did it really intend to protect the interests of the native Palestinian population or was Revisionist Zionism and Zionism the same all along with only some differences in outward appearance? As late as 1935, the main strand of Zionism continued to reject the idea of a Jewish state, this was the Weismann Zionism, whereas Revisionist Zionists led by Ze’ev Jabotinsky, a Russian Jewish Revisionist Zionist leader, clamored for the abandoned colonialist vision of Theodor Herzl. Was all of this just a Zionist facade?
Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, did Revisionist Zionism provoke the emerging Islamic Nationalism and the Islamist movement or did the later unintentionally aid Revisionist Zionism and help it dominate the whole Zionist agenda? Were the Egyptian political elite subject to a conspiracy so that they fell for the “treachery” of the Zionists or were they supportive of a benign form of Zionism and were late in recognizing the emergence of the violent, racist, supremacist Zionism that triumphed late in the 1930’s? Answers to these questions determine how Egypt’s early support for Zionism can be viewed.
Let’s learn from the mistakes of the last 100 years. Let’s confront this inconvenient history and use it as a basis for the possibility of coexistence. Millions of Palestinians continue to live in refugee camps, millions of Palestinians continue to languish stranded under cruel occupation. The image of the Palestinians living literally underneath high speed “Israeli only” trains linking Jerusalem to neighboring “Jewish only” communities will forever stay etched the memory of many of the people who have seen it, it should be a source of shame for Israelis and Israel’s supporters.
It is time to actively work towards achieving the second half of the Balfour Declaration. Historical examples of peaceful and positive coexistence are not limited to Egypt. It is time to remember that the majority of the Jews of Hebron and Safad were actually saved from the massacres, not just by the British Army, but also by their Palestinian neighbors. It is time to uncover more inconvenient history and use it as the basis for a better future. Personal narratives of Palestinians, like those of Fay Afaf Kanafani, tell of similar stories of successful coexistence between Palestinians and Jews even into the 1940’s. Digging into the truth of what really happened on the ground may prove harder than that of Egypt because of the relatively advanced nature of the Egyptian press and political structure compared to that of British Mandate Palestine. The Egyptian experience should nonetheless help in looking at what is possible over the next 100 years.
Ayman S. Ashour
This essay was first published by Egyptian Streets here